Fathers can influence the sex of their offspring, scientists show
Fathers can influence the sex of their offspring,
scientists show
It has traditionally
been thought that in mammals only mothers are able to influence the sex of
their offspring.
But a new study in
wild mice led by Dr Aurelio Malo of Oxford University's Department of Zoology
has shown that fathers can, in fact, influence sex ratios.
The paper is published
in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B and involves
researchers from the UK, Spain and the USA.
Dr Malo said: 'In
mammals, theory predicts that offspring sex ratios can only be determined by
the mother, as fathers have always been thought to inseminate an equal
proportion of X and Y sperm, having a random effect on offspring sex that they
could not shift from equality, or 50:50.
'Also, mothers can
influence their offspring in a number of ways from copulation to birth, whereas
fathers have control over sperm only. This gives mothers more scope to alter
the sex ratio of their offspring. The physical costs of gestation are obviously
higher for the mother, so it's in her own interests from an evolutionary point
of view to invest her resources wisely in terms of the sex, size and quality of
her offspring.
'Using a wild rodent
model - the white-footed mouse - in lab conditions, we found that there is a
relationship between a father's genetic quality and the proportion of sons and
daughters he has. We then showed that this relationship is mediated by a trait
that is exclusive to the father: the size of the nuclei in their sperm, which
reflects the proportion of X to Y sperm. Fathers with higher genetic quality
produce sperm with smaller head nuclei - a higher proportion of Y sperm - and
go on to produce more sons than daughters.
'The implications are
important, as we now have the proof that fathers matter independently of any
maternal effects. Scientists can now improve their predictive models of sex
ratios at birth, including not only mothers but also fathers.'
The researchers also
provide an adaptive explanation for why it's in the father's interests to alter
the probability of having sons or daughters. According to Dr Malo, one
plausible reason is that males of lower genetic quality minimise the cost of
having sons, which are more susceptible to the negative effects of inbreeding
on fertility, by shifting the sex ratio to daughters, which are more resilient
to these negative effects of inbreeding.
Dr Malo added: 'Using
a wild species and not a domestic model such as lab mice allows us to
extrapolate to other wild species, and to make inferences about adaptation -
that is, why natural selection has selected for this ability in fathers. These
findings are potentially applicable to any other mammalian species, including
our own. However, the extent to which we find the effects uncovered here
depends very much on the mating systems. For instance, in more monogamous
species the expectation that fathers would evolve an ability to manipulate sex
ratios in their own interests is less clear.
'Predicting sex ratios
has great interest for humans, as well as bioethical implications. In domestic
species, such as livestock and pets, the ability to manipulate sex ratios has
important economic implications. In endangered species, skewed population sex
ratios can push species to the brink of extinction, so breeding programmes
could pair males and females according to individual attributes that help
achieve the rarer sex at birth.
'The long-held
expectation that fathers would inseminate the same proportion of X and Y sperm
generated at meiosis has stopped scientists from exploring paternal effects in
other mammals. By showing that fathers can adjust sex ratios by varying sperm
types, we help open the gates of a new research area of paternal effects on sex
ratios. For example, do mothers and fathers have the same or opposing sex
allocation interests? Does this vary across species and contexts?
'In a nutshell, we now
know that dads, as well as mums, can alter the sex of their offspring, and that
the ability to do so might have evolved through natural selection.'
Comments
Post a Comment